|
 |
e0e2de7 |
PURPOSE of /CoreOS/patch/Regression/Regression-wrong-name-used-when-adding-new-file
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Description: Test for Regression: wrong name used when adding new file
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Author: Karel Srot <ksrot@redhat.com>
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Bug summary: Regression: wrong name used when adding new file
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Description:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #549122 +++
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Description of problem:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Regression: Suffix inside of new files of patch files are added to new files.
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Take http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/popt/popt-1.13-multilib.patch
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
for example for reproducing:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
With patch-2.6-1, "%patch0 -p1 -b .multilib" causes:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 tux tux 256 Dec 20 15:26 footer_no_timestamp.html.multilib
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 tux tux 0 Dec 20 15:26 footer_no_timestamp.html.multilib.multilib
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 tux tux 51543 Dec 20 15:26 Doxyfile.in
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 tux tux 51519 May 25 2007 Doxyfile.in.multilib
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
With patch-2.5.4-36, "%patch0 -p1 -b .multilib" causes:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 tux tux 256 Dec 20 15:32 footer_no_timestamp.html
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
---------- 1 tux tux 0 Dec 20 15:32 footer_no_timestamp.html.multilib
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 tux tux 51543 Dec 20 15:32 Doxyfile.in
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
-rw-r--r-- 1 tux tux 51519 May 25 2007 Doxyfile.in.multilib
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
You see what I mean? If the file is created by the patch file, the suffix
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
inside of the patch is appended to the new created file. That behaviour has
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
been introduced with the new version and it looks like a regression to me.
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
patch-2.6-1
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
patch-2.5.4-36
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
How reproducible:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Everytime, see above.
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Actual results:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Regression: Suffixes inside of patches at new files are added to new files
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Expected results:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Good old behaviour like at patch-2.5.4-36.
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
--- Additional comment from twaugh@redhat.com on 2009-12-21 05:17:27 EDT ---
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Verified.
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Affects F-12 and F-11 as well.
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
--- Additional comment from twaugh@redhat.com on 2009-12-21 11:44:02 EDT ---
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
Reported upstream:
|
|
|
e0e2de7 |
https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?28367
|